The same goes for music in a different dimension. ![]() ![]() If the dance has that geometric aesthetic, it will impact the viewers in a certain way, though they may not know the story or understand what the dance is. To be able to do seemingly illogical things like throwing your hands and legs around, but still have an absolute coherence to everything that you want to depict takes years of training and practice. If that coherence was absent, you would not enjoy the dance. But if you watch closely enough, there is a very deep coherence to everything that is happening. ![]() On the surface, there seems to be nothing to it. For example, in Indian classical dance, the dancer may seem to be just moving their hands and legs about at random. But if you look closely enough, there is a very profound system to the whole process. If you observe a dance, on the surface, there seems to be no logical coherence to what is happening. Today, modern physicists are using such words – they say creation seems to be in a dance. If they cannot dance they cannot be gods! This is because the closest analogy you can give to the phenomenon of creation is that it is like a dance. Sadhguru: India is the only place where our gods must dance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |